Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 10:01:09 +0200 (MET DST)
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Georg Horn wrote:
> Yes, it's made for cellular phones, but the phone doesn't directly talk
> http to a web server, but talks wap to a wap server (or gateway) which
> either produces the content itself or translates the request into http,
> sends it to a web server, and gives the answer back to the phone.
Right. So you want to be able to talk WTP (Wireless Transaction Protocol)
with a WAP server/gateway to get its contents?
Well I guess it is a fair idea. It seems it can be used ontop of IP. It does
however seems like quite a bit of work. You know of any open source
initiative to talk this protocol?
> I don't know why the hell they invented just another protocol... ;-)
I'll tell you why: they're the telecom industry. They always invent things
again. And they want a new protocol to better control the data and allow the
operators to charge for services. WAP is a lot about charging customers.
I'd vote for plain IP all the way to my phone any day.
> Well, at least the data between gateway and phone is transfered as a
> binary, compacter bytecode than the verbose http-protocol.
-- Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77 ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`olReceived on 2000-06-14