On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:08:04PM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>
> > using a recent version of libtool should suffice.
>
> I am using the most recent libtool non-beta version I'm aware of: 1.3.5.
>
it is ok

> > which name scheme are you thinking at?
>
> I'm gonna follow the guidelines stated in the libtool manual. That means the
> version numbers of the library binaries will be set independent of the
> release/library version. The libraries will mainly be incrementaly numbered.
> The previous used interface number 0, the upcoming release will be number 1.
> (I guess it could still be number 0 only revision 1, but I wanted to
> leap-start this a little.)
>
> The reason for the version numbering not being the same as the library
> version is of course that the system used by system linkers are different
> from the versioning I use when naming the libraries.
>

i think i can agree happily :)

all that will start already from 7.5?

-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
  --[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50