Regarding the no 'Reply-To:' on the list
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 08:57:26 +0200 (MET DST)
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, J. Cone wrote:
> >I am, and the d*rned list server doesn't allow me to set Reply-To: so thus
> >it is most convenient to just use reply-all and thus I mostly reply to
> >both the list and the sender.
> I will use reply-all, as you suggest. Is the list server open-source and
> worth hacking?
The software allows it fine and is not the problem.
The problem is with sourceforge.net (that hosts our mailing lists). They
decided to ban the use of Reply-To: set to the list:
This debate is as old as there have been mailing lists. Two of the more
interesting links to read in this subject are these:
Users who subscribe to mailing lists should make an effort to use filters
that discards duplicates. It'll make their lifes better.
-- Daniel Stenberg -- curl groks URLs -- http://curl.haxx.se/Received on 2002-04-04