On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Gerrit Bruchhäuser wrote:

> Yes, that would have been wrong. I noticed the mistake and send a second
> mail. If that has been correct then the attached should be as well.

Yeah, I got that mail after I replied!

> The patch contains the following changes:

The patch is incorrect:

> +typedef struct Curl_multi* CURLM;

Neither of the typedefs should be pointers, they should be structs as they
were previously 'void' and not 'void *'.

This minor mistake aside, is there anyone who believes this could possibly
break the ABI if introduced now?

-- 
  Commercial curl and libcurl Technical Support: http://haxx.se/curl.html