On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Guenter Knauf wrote:

>> If you have further issues you want to see get done in this release, speak

> can you please give me your oppinion about proceeding with the sin6_scope_id
> thing? Should I proceed, and add HAVE_SIN6_SCOPE_ID to all non-configure
> builds, and finally patch connect.c as I posted with first post of this
> thread?

I think so, it looks fine to my rather limited IPv6-experienced brain!

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se