> "replacement for accept()" sounds like a good idea but in the second
> thought, I do not find any use case in which an application would need to
> implement this callback. On the other hand, applications may need to set
> socket options before data transfer kicks off. I am going to prepare a
> patch for CURL_SOCKOPTFUNCTION after accept() gets called and returned
> success.
>
>
Attached is the patch providing the functionality.

Thanks,

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html