Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

appveyor: Use parallel compilation on appveyor with CMake #4508

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

janisozaur
Copy link
Contributor

Appveyor provides 2 CPUs for each builder[1], make sure to use parallel
compilation, when running with CMake. CMake learned this new option in
version 3.12[2] and the version provided by appveyor is fresh enough.

Curl doesn't really take that long to build and it is using the slowest
builder available, msbuild, so expect only a moderate improvement in
build times.

[1] https://www.appveyor.com/docs/build-environment/
[2] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.12/release/3.12.html

Appveyor provides 2 CPUs for each builder[1], make sure to use parallel
compilation, when running with CMake. CMake learned this new option in
version 3.12[2] and the version provided by appveyor is fresh enough.

Curl doesn't really take that long to build and it is using the slowest
builder available, msbuild, so expect only a moderate improvement in
build times.

[1] https://www.appveyor.com/docs/build-environment/
[2] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.12/release/3.12.html
@janisozaur janisozaur changed the title appveyor: Use two parallel compilation on appveyor with CMake appveyor: Use parallel compilation on appveyor with CMake Oct 19, 2019
@bagder bagder added the cmake label Oct 19, 2019
@bagder bagder closed this in 5038162 Oct 23, 2019
@bagder
Copy link
Member

bagder commented Oct 23, 2019

Thanks!

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants