Re: int64_t vs long long
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:33:29 +0200
> > intptr_t
> And a portable proper print formatting directive to print it as a
> decimal value would be...?
Forget my quick/dumb question ;-)
And if intptr_t is available, then int64_t certainly is available.
I should have explicitly asked for intrinsec data types.
-- -=[Yang]=-Received on 2008-06-13