On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Dan Fandrich wrote:

>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa385325.aspx
>
> Until some new URL extension comes along, that seems like the right way to
> handle it.

I agree. Here's a link to the RFC4007 section describing it:

         http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4007#section-11

Phil, how do you feel about poking the patch to work with this?

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se