Re: curl_off_t suffix
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:20:07 +0200
2008/8/14, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Dan Fandrich wrote:
> > Boy, that's going to be fun to parse in m4! It may be easier to parse
> > INT64_MAX instead and extract the suffix; Watcom defines that as a simple
> > #define INT64_MAX 9223372036854775807LL
> > but, surely, that's in itself no more portable.
> I wouldn't be surprised to find some things define it as
> ((int64_t) 9223372036854775807) or similar.
Yes that's quite possible for INT64_MAX. What I didn't expect was the
Watcom expansion of INT64_C() !!!!!!!!!
Do you happen to know other signed constant suffixes besides 'L' 'LL'
'i128' 'i64' 'i32' 'i16' 'i8'?
-- -=[Yang]=-Received on 2008-08-14