Re: libcurl version number
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:42:28 -0400
On Nov 1, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Dan Fandrich wrote:
>> Just a friendly reminder to bump the "age" field of the libcurl.so
>> version number before the release. That seems to be forgotten more
>> times than not...
> Given that we're already in the feature freeze and even towards the
> end of it, I've now bumped the number.
> I also offers some time for everyone to verify that it looks right.
> I didn't bump the "age" field but the "revision" one... If I bump
> the age field (without bumping "current"), libtool creates an so.3
This should be right since I don't think any new interfaces were
added. The rules are:
If current version is C:R:A
and there are any source changes, then use C:R+1:A
but if interfaces were added use C+1:0:A+1
unless interfaces were removed, then use C+1:0:0
That should do the right thing on all platforms.
Received on 2008-11-02