cURL / Mailing Lists / curl-library / Single Mail


Re: CHANGES, manual or automatic?

From: Joshua Kwan <>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:47:59 -0700

On 4/10/10 14:53, "Daniel Stenberg" <> wrote:
> But CHANGES is not a complete changelog of all changes. "git log" contains
> MUCH more details. If we wanted to generate CHANGES with git, we'd have to
> somehow mark sections of commit messages as suitable for CHANGES so that the
> unsuitable parts could be skipped. I want CHANGES to remain a fairly detailed
> log explain what we did and when, but it doesn't have to mention everything,
> like comment fixes, white space edits, spellfixes and things like that, that
> no reader will care about.

How about 'git shortlog' and enforce that people should have descriptive
subject lines for their changes?


List admin:
Received on 2010-04-11