On Friday 18 February 2011 16:15:49 Andreas Zwinkau wrote:
> A counter-argument would be that is ok that typecheck-gcc.h relies on
> implementation-specific gcc behavior, but non-portable code should be
> avoided.

The question is why typecheck-gcc.h is getting included when you are not
compiling with gcc.

Kamil
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2011-02-18