RE: Different treatment of "no SSL support on server side" in FTP and SMTP
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:23:41 +0000
> > My suggestion would be to use FTP's treatment for SMTP (the one I am
> > interested) and maybe for other modules (IMAP and POP3) to be truly
> > consistent.
> > I can not imagine however how backward compability with existing codes
> > would be accomplished.
> We don't need to be backward compatible with bugs in that sense. Can you
> provide a patch for this fix?
Please find attached a patch for this as well as the CURLUSESSL_TRY problem
I mentioned in my email.
Received on 2012-01-04