Actually I used expect, but I had troubles too :( It works better at the
moment to connect, but the process never dies, so I have like 50 telnet
processes open every time I execute the script and remains alive until I
Kill them...

R. Roberto Quirarte C.
. On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 11:23, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Just out of curiosity - could you use `expect` (along with telnet)
> instead of curl for this? Just curious, since telnet support isn't
> exactly curl's forte.
>
> - Kevin

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
Received on 2003-04-04