On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, :) wrote:

> I hope nobody is mad at me :) If you have any idea, what should I do or try,
> I will try to do it.

We don't know what the reason is.

> My conclusion from your ideas is, that it has to be recompiled with
> different (bigger) buffer size ...

No, that wasn't what I've suggested. In the past we've even seen Windows
performance *go down* when the buffer size was increased.

> or this is already fixed and windows suffer from another bug in sockets? :D

You have to start trying different approaches. Read about TCP bugs, try alter
buffer sizes, check the socket options, read libcurl code. We don't know.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/curl-users
FAQ:        http://curl.haxx.se/docs/faq.html
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html