On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:42:15PM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> I agree with that and I just committed your patch (with my added docs
> and some minor comments).
>
> It made me think about the socks5-dns-resolve approach. Would it make
> sense to call that SOCKS5A just to be consistent? I mean instead of
> having that separate setopt option?

What about adding an option --proxy-resolve instead that turns a normal
SOCKS4 into SOCKS4A and SOCKS5 into "SOCKS5A"?

>>> Dan

-- 
http://www.MoveAnnouncer.com              The web change of address service
          Let webmasters know that your web site has moved