On Sun, 29 Jun 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:

> What I'm seeing is that a lot of time is spent in multi_addtimeout
> because the list of timeouts is really long (tens of thousands of
> entries). Is there something I can do to avoid this phenomenon?

Hi Florian,

Could you please give the attached patch a go and see if it makes anything
better for your test case? It introduces a new internal function for the
expiry handling that really should prevent that sort of "overload" you were
seeing.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html