On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Guenter wrote:

> I'm not 100% sure since not looked at the code, but AFAICT infof() does need
> a linebreak where failf() does not.

That's how it works, yes. Although of course strictly speaking it doesn't
_need_ the newlines, it'll just appear less nice in the outputs.

The theory behind it is of course that infof() is used for debug traces while
failf() is mostly just a single line stored for a particular failure.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se