Bugs item #1326676, was opened at 2005-10-14 13:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by temprimus
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100976&aid=1326676&group_id=976

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: compile or build problem
Group: wrong behaviour
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: TemPRImuS (temprimus)
Assigned to: Daniel Stenberg (bagder)
Summary: SSLLIBS linked for static ssl in Makefile.vc6

Initial Comment:
The configuration debug-ssl and debug-ssl-zlib links
the SSL libraries to the result. The release-ssl and
release-ssl-zlib does not link them. I like the
behaviour of the release builds more.

code: Makefile.vc6 :

line 251 : LNK = $(LNKLIB) $(SSLLIBS) $(LFLAGSSSL)
/out:$(DIROBJ)\

line 288 : LNK = $(LNKLIB) $(SSLLIBS) $(ZLIBLIBS)
$(LFLAGSSSL) $(LFLAGSZLIB) /out:$(DIROBJ)\

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: TemPRImuS (temprimus)
Date: 2005-10-21 17:06

Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1359436

diff attached

somehow a part of the file became duplicated after the
previous change, this diff intends to fix that too.

(a saw that this file in the cvs is binary. Because of this
there are windows and unix lineends in the file.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Stenberg (bagder)
Date: 2005-10-20 21:10

Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1110

Can you provide a diff for this change please?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: TemPRImuS (temprimus)
Date: 2005-10-14 16:52

Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1359436

Sorry if it wasn't clear. This is for the static ssl
versions in the debug builds. I meant I want to link the
static ssl libraries to the executable myself and not to the
libcurld.lib. This is how the release versions work.
For example if I wish to debug (or not to debug) the openssl
library then I want to have a choice which one of the ssl
libraries to link to the executable.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Stenberg (bagder)
Date: 2005-10-14 15:20

Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1110

Isn't it often easier to debug these things if you link
statically than when using DLLs?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100976&aid=1326676&group_id=976
Received on 2005-10-21